Peter Rollins at SMU

Tags

, ,

One of the things I really like about being back in academia is that you never know who is going to show up. Yesterday a friend told me that Peter Rollins was going to be at a church in the Dallas area on Sunday. I began digging around to try to find out if there was any way that I might be able to connect with him while he was in the area to get some guidance on my paper for philosophy of religion on the philosophical foundations of the emergent conversation… I discovered that he would be in a class at Perkins at 10am and he was gracious enough to meet with me for about thirty minutes afterwards to discuss my interests.

Rollins is nearly the perfect person for me to have met because he is a philosopher and he is a part of the emerging conversation. He also is the author of a book that several people had recommended to me as a very important book for me to read for my paper: How (Not) to Speak of God. He has subsequently written The Fidelity of Betrayal: Toward a Church Beyond Belief.

The timing of his visit, from my perspective, could not have been any better.

Here are a few of many arresting statements he made in his lecture this morning:

  • The rule of the leader is to refuse to be a leader. The priest refuses the priesthood so they can insist on the priesthood of all believers.
  • If you seek God becasue you seek meaning, you are seeking meaning not God.
  • Sometimes the things that we think are making a difference are the very things that keep us from making a difference. (This was one of the main ideas that he spent quite a lot of time fleshing out. He pointed to things like working at a soup kitchen as a possible way of allowing us to do some good which can actually serve to make us more comfortable with not actually changing. Or talking about how superficial fashion is, while nevertheless shopping for fashionable clothes.)

It must be Halloween

I woke up this morning to hear the local news anchor say: “Did you feel the earthquake this morning? 911 operators were inundated with phone calls from Irving, TX reporting an earthquake.”

And apparently there was in a fact a 3.0 earthquake this morning. Given the weird enviornment that seems to be surrounding the Cowboys lately, maybe God was trying to take out Texas Stadium…

And even closer to home, as I was walking to the bus stop this morning the sprinkler system came on for about two blocks. I was walking on a sidewalk that had a busy street on one side and a park on the other (that had more sprinklers going on). So, there was no where to run and no where to hide. I got soaked. Which was humbling when I got on the bus all wet (on a completely otherwise beautiful sunny morning). This guy on the bus gave me a look that seemed to say, “Dude, I can understand getting out of the shower and rushing out of the house so your hair is wet, but why were you wearing your clothes in the shower?”

Hopefully I can dry off before the next earthquake comes…

Are Christians Really Good Liars?

In a previous post I vented about my frustration with the slanderous emails I received about one of the Presidential candidates. Today I noticed that Adam Hamilton has posted about receiving similar emails. He makes a very interesting (and disturbing) observation that he consistently receives these emails from Christians, not from folks from another religious background, or from people who do not believe in God. Are Christians particularly good at spreading lies, or are we particularly lazy, or uninformed? I appreciate Adam’s post on this topic, and the reasonable response he occasionally offers to the emails he receives.

Steve Rankin has recently posted about a similar trend, except through campaign ads. His disgust at the way that Christians have been influenced by distortions and lies is palpable. And, I must confess I identify with his frustration. I can see how people could come up with good reasons to vote for McCain or Obama. Yet, the reasons Christians offer far too often are not good reasons because they are based in fear or lies. (For example: It is not a good reason to vote for McCain because Obama is a Muslim. In fact, Obama is a professing Christian, which is why that would not be a good reason… it is really pretty straight forward.)

It seems to me that we have a tremendous opportunity in being able to voice our opinion in the political process by voting. This year it has been particularly obvious that with this opportunity comes great responsibility. I believe that Christians have an obligation to be informed and to take the time to separate the truth from lies, and then vote based on the real issues at stake. We should be a city on a hill, or salt and light in an often putrid process… but too often we seem to be the ones that are keeping the rumor mill going and perpetuating misinformation. God help us.

Good thing the election is almost here, maybe I can stay off this soapbox for awhile…

“I’m Kevin and I approve this message.”

Updates to Wesleyan Resources Page

I have added a few resources over the past few days to the Wesleyan Resources Page. If you are interested, I have listed a few resources under the headings of “Wesley’s Works,” “Wesley Biographies,” and “Wesleyan Theology.”

I will continue updating this page in the days, weeks, and months to come.

On another note: I would like to be able to have a table of contents at the top of that page so that all of the headings could be listed at the top, and then people could click on, say “Wesley Biographies,” and it would take them to the list of Wesley Biographies. The only problem is – I don’t know how to do that. If you do and are willing to help me, please shoot me an email at deeplycommitted (at) gmail (dot) com, or bless me with your wisdom in the comments.

What’s New at Deeply Committed

I have made a few changes to deeply committed. The most obvious change is that I have changed themes. This allowed me to have a header with a bit more interest. (Bonus points to the first person who correctly identifies what the header is a picture of.)

Another significant change is that I have deleted the “Documents” page and I have added a “Wesleyan Resources” page. The purpose of this page is to provide links to some important Wesleyan Resources. I will try to update this page periodically. I started by providing links to the two different versions of Wesley’s works that are currently in print. I will also add works on Wesley biographies, Wesleyan theology, Methodist history, and more. You can go to the Wesleyan Resources pages by clicking here, or click on the Wesleyan Resources tab at the top of this page.

I also have updated a few things here and there throughout the blog. I updated the “About Me” page, and cleaned up a few other things. I hope these updates are helpful improvements.

By the way, if you have any suggestions about how to improve this blog, or comments about what you would like to see in the future, please feel free to give your input in the comments.

Philosophical Foundations of the Emergent Church

Tags

, , ,

Ok, I need your help! I am thinking about writing my term paper for Philosophy of Religion on Philosophical Foundations of the Emergent Church. I have read quite a bit of the work of important voices in the Emergent Church (McLaren, Jones, Kimball) but I am not as confident in my understanding of the philosophers and philosophies that influence folks in the Emergent Church. In my paper, I am particularly interested in looking at issues of epistemology (concerns the origins, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge). On the Emergent account, how do we come to know God? How do we go about investigating the truth claims of a proposition? Who and what have influenced emergent understandings of these issues?

My interest in this paper is not to write an apologetic, or to attack the Emergent Church movement, rather it is to seek to understand the foundations that it is built upon better.

I would be grateful if you would post any specific books that you would recommend in the comments (again, I am not looking for books by the Emergent authors like McLaren’s Everything Must Change, but books that have deeply informed McLaren and others and are at work behind the scenes in their practical theology). I would appreciate books that might provide a general introduction to postmodern philosophy that are particularly insightful to folks in emergent, and particularly important works by actual philosophers that have influenced the emergent understanding of epistemology and answering truth claims about God.

One more request: If you don’t know, but you know someone who might have ideas, I would be grateful if you would take a second to email them and mention this post and ask them to help me out. And if you happen to have a direct contact to Brian McLaren, Tony Jones, Dan Kimball, or anyone else, you get bonus points if you get them to directly respond! (Notice how I linked to their names so that they might stumble upon my post… devious, I know…)

I think this paper could make an important contribution to understanding the Emergent Church, but my ability to undertake it will depend on being able to find some starting points for getting into the material.

Bridwell Library is Awesome!

Bridwell Library, the library for the Perkins School of Theology at Southern Methodist University, is amazing! Every four months or so Bridwell has a different exhibit which highlights some of the great items that are contained in Bridwell’s special collections. The current exhibit is called “Welcome Additions” and it shows some of the wonderful items that Bridwell has acquired in the last year or so.

I needed a study break last week, so I wandered into the exhibit. I was delighted to see an original letter that written by John Wesley on one side, and written by Thomas Coke on the other.

The first picture is the one by Wesley and the second is the one written by Coke.

Bridwell also has a copy of the Minutes that was given to a “fellow laborer” which was, I believe, the practice for itinerant preachers, they were given a copy of the minutes with an inscription like the one pictured, signed by John Wesley. This one is dated 1789, so Wesley would have been about 86. Here is a picture of the Minutes signed by Wesley:

Now isn’t history fun and exciting?!? (Note: You should be able to click on each picture to see a larger version.)

Evangelical Enchantment and Disenchantment – Hempton Lectures Part I

Dr. David Hempton gave two excellent lectures the beginning of this week here at SMU. Both of his lectures offered glimpses into his forthcoming book, Evangelical Disenchantment: Nine Portraits of Faith and Doubt. Intereestingly, his lecture series was titled: Evangelical Enchantment and Disenchantment, so I was somewhat surprised to notice that the title of the book so clearly draws your attention to one side of what he focused on in his lectures.

Dr. Hempton’s first lecture was titled “Culture Wars: George Eliot and Fundamentalism.” In this lecture Hempton look at the author Mary Ann Evans, whose pen name was George Eliot, and her relationship with evangelicalism. Hempton discussed three aspects of evangelical enchantment that initially appealed to Eliot: the offer of a fresh start (the new birth), disciplined spirituality, and mobilization and transformation by lay agency and an emphasis on hymn singing. Hempton’s discussion of Methodist hymnody, in particular, caught my attention. He argued that the 1737 Hymnbook that Wesley published in Georgia was probably the first hymnbook published in America. He also discussed at length the importance of the 1780 edition.

The symbol of Eliot’s disenchantment was Rev. Cumming who Hempton compared to a modern day Hal Lindsey or Tim LaHaye. Eliot despised the lack of love that she saw in Cummings ministry and his rather gleeful proclamation that others were going to hell.

One of the primary themes I gleaned from this lecture was that the closer evangelicalism came to dogmatism and exclusivism, the more disenchanting it was to the folks in Hempton’s study.

Hempton’s Second lecture was titled “Artists in Revolt: Vincent Van Gogh and James Baldwin.” I will try to post a brief summary of that lecture and some further thoughts in the next few days.