• About Me

Kevin M. Watson

Kevin M. Watson

Tag Archives: Book Review

Mainline or Methodist?

05 Tuesday Aug 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Book Review, Mainline or Methodist, Scott Kisker

Discipleship Resources has just released Mainline or Methodist? by Scott Kisker. I got a copy of the book in the mail yesterday and couldn’t stop reading it until I ran out of pages. My initial interest was largely due to the fact that Scott was one of my teachers and mentors at Wesley Theological Seminary. He is one of a handful of people who have had a major impact on who I am, and who I am becoming. (Fair warning: this might be the least objective comments I have ever written about a book.) So, I was initially excited about the book because of the person who wrote it. However, as I began reading it, I got really into it because of what was being said, not who was saying it.

In Mainline or Methodist? Scott Kisker argues that “real Methodism declined because we replaced those peculiarities that made us Methodist with a bland, acceptable, almost civil religion, barely distinguishable from other traditions also now know as ‘mainline.’ Like the Israelites under the judges, we wanted to be like the other nations. We no longer wanted to be an odd, somewhat disreputable people. And we have begun to reap the consequences” (13). Kisker argues that authentic Methodism does not seek to solve its own problems, it does not see itself as the answer. Instead, it looks to God’s grace and God’s power to save us. After outlining the hole that the contemporary UMC has dug for itself, and the distance it has wandered away from its Wesleyan roots, Kisker argues that true Methodism offers a vision, message, method, conversation, and a way forward for the United Methodist Church. Bold yet graceful, Mainline or Methodist? challenged me and also stimulated my thoughts about what it means to be a pastor in the United Methodist Church and where I hope our church is heading. My hope is that people like Scott Kisker will be used by God to impact the future and direction of Methodism.

I commend this book to you and would be interested in your thoughts if you have a chance to read it.

Book Review: In Constant Prayer

14 Wednesday May 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Book Review, In Constant Prayer, Robert Benson

In Constant Prayer is the second book in Thomas Nelson’s The Ancient Practices Series. (I previously reviewed the first book in this series – Brian McLaren’s Finding Our Way Again – here.) Robert Benson makes a powerful case for why every Christian should pray the daily office. Benson is a gifted and engaging writer. He does two things exceptionally well: he is able to explain a practice that may be unfamiliar to many mainline and evangelical Christians in a way that is both lucid and persuasive, and he writes in a way that really brings you into the conversation. He comes across as very humble and willing to be vulnerable. This is not a book written from an expert in prayer to people that the author is clearly on a pedestal above his audience. Instead, Benson writes to people who really want to make time for God, but often struggle to do so. And he writes not as someone who has found all the answers, but as someone who is willing to admit that he has often struggled himself to make time to pray the daily office.

The daily office is “in the simplest terms… a regular pattern and order for formal worship and prayer that is offered to God at specific times throughout the course of the day. Each set of prayers, known as an office, is made up of psalms, scriptures, and prayers” (9-10). Benson’s professed goal is “to open up some of the mystery of the daily office for those who have had little or no exposure to this ancient way of Christian prayer” (10). For Benson this is no trivial matter as he has become convinced that “if the Church is to live, and actually be alive, one of the reasons, maybe the most important and maybe even the only reason, will be because we have taken up our place in the line of the generations of the faithful who came before us. It will be because we pray the prayer that Christ himself prayed when he walked among us and now longs to pray though us” (72-73).

Perhaps the highest praise that I can offer for this book is that in a time when there are more books on prayer than any sane person could read, this is one of the books I would recommend to someone who seeks encouragement in their prayer life and who seeks some basic guidance for not thinking about praying, but for actually praying.

The book also contains a sample office of morning prayer. Since reading this book, I have begun praying this morning prayer and am considering purchasing one of the prayer books that he mentions in the book.

I would especially recommend this book to spiritual leaders who are finding that their own devotional life is drying up. Benson is very candid about the reality that we sometimes fail to make time to spend in prayer with God. He writes in a way that is not accusatory and he even includes himself in the group of people who sometimes fail. But he lifts up the daily office as a tested and well-worn practice that helps “the rest of us” grow in our relationship with God. If you are struggling with consistent time with God in prayer, or you are “stuck” in your prayer life, this book would be well worth the read.

Finding Our Way Again by Brian McLaren

08 Thursday May 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Book Review, Brian McLaren, Finding Our Way Again

“The purpose of the ancient way and the ancient practices is not to make us more religious. It is to make us more alive. Alive to God. Alive to our spouses, parents, children, neighbors, strangers, and yes, even our enemies” (182). This seems to be the central thesis of Brian McLaren’s latest book Finding Our Way Again: The Return of the Ancient Practices. This is the first book in a new series published by Thomas Nelson called “The Ancient Practices Series.” The series consists of eight books dealing with ancient Christian practices. Finding Our Way Again: The Return of the Ancient Practices, is the introductory volume in this series.

Recently, there has been quite a bit written about a third way that goes beyond the polarizing options between conservative and liberal or left and right. McLaren, however, writes that “more and more of us feel, more and more intensely, the need for a fresh, creative alternative – a fourth alternative, something beyond militarist scientific secularism, pushy religious fundamentalism, and mushy amorphous spirituality…. The challenge of the future will require, we realize, rediscovery and adaptive reuse of resources from the ancient past” (5-6)

As a result, McLaren’s book, and the series of book that he is introducing, seek to flesh out this “fourth way” by reaching “beyond a reductionistic secularism, beyond a reactive and intransigent fundamentalism, and beyond a vague, consumerist spirituality” (6).

I always enjoy reading McLaren’s work because he is a gifted writer. His conversational style and his ability to bring you into the story that he is telling make it easy to go along with him for the ride that he wants to take you on. He has the ability to make you feel as if he is actually speaking directly to you saying, “Hey, here are some things that I have been thinking about. Let me show you what I am seeing and see what you think about it.”

Finding Our Way Again is certainly no exception to McLaren’s ability to engage the reader and invite them into a conversation. McLaren is at his best in the chapters where he explains the ancient practices of katharsis, fotosis, and theosis. In these chapters he explains these concepts by asking the reader to imagine themselves to be “a young spiritual seeker who has just come into possession of a time machine… You come to a monastery and are given a hospitable welcome. You meet with the abbess, a short, wrinkled, slightly hunched-over woman who walks with a stick at a pace that exceeds the speed limit you would imagine for a wrinkled, slightly hunched-over woman” (148). I suspect that most authors would not be able to pull this off in a believable way. However, at least for me, I read this passage and never blinked. Before I knew it, I was fully absorbed in this new world with an abbess from the Middle Ages explaining these ancient practices through very ordinary stories and exercises.

In this volume, at least, McLaren also seems to occasionally overstate his case. I found his argument for “Why Spiritual Practices Matter” in the second chapter to be the least convincing of the book. The chapter begins with a focus on the role that I play in forming my character that seems to tend toward works righteousness. The notion of sin that is presented seems to be one where sin is the result of bad habits that come from my not tending the soil of my character closely enough, rather than something that is deeply ingrained within each one of us and cannot be uprooted by our own efforts, but only by the grace of God.

I also thought that McLaren was a little too anxious to make these Christian practices applicable to everyone, whether they are a Christian or not. He writes, “In these two ways, then, paying attention to ‘life practices’ is worthwhile for everybody, those who consider themselves spiritual and those who don’t: first, because nobody wants to become a tedious fart, and second, because nobody wants to miss Life because they’re short on legroom and sleep in economy class [a reference to a story he just told about being on a long flight in economy class]” (17). To be fair, McLaren does immediately qualify this by saying “I haven’t told the whole story though… Spiritual practices are ways of becoming awake and staying awake to God — that’s the third reason” (17-18). But still, the argument seems to be a bit of a reach. His argument seems to be analogous to saying that everyone should play basketball because nobody wants to become overweight and die of a heart attack. There is a difference between making the case for the importance of a good diet and exercise and universalizing the importance of one particular type of exercise. I may be misunderstanding McLaren’s argument, but it seems that in wanting to try to find something universally beneficial about the ancient practices, he would either fall into the trap of universalizing practices that are specifically Christian (Would non-Christians agree that there is a benefit to following the liturgical year?) on the one hand, or watering down the specifically Christian content of the Christian practices and making them nearly unrecognizable on the other hand.

Aside from the arguments I found to be distracting in that particular chapter, there were several statements that stuck with me and stirred up visions, thoughts, and dreams within me that remained long after I closed the cover of the book. Here are two of my favorites:

I think that’s part of what’s going on in this time of change and transition. Old sectarian turf wars are giving way to a sharing of resources — heroes, practices, flavors, and styles of practice. And this, in a way, is itself a new practice, namely, the sharing of previously proprietary practices. We might say that Christianity is beginning to go ‘open source'” (58).

I also really appreciated McLaren’s discussion of the way that God’s Spirit moves within institutions and how the work of God’s Spirit cannot be contained or hampered by bureaucracy. He discusses the work of William Wilberforce and others in England who worked to end slavery, despite the vigorous defense of slavery by the Anglican Church. “Their fledgling movement grew in the spaces between the institutional structures of their day, not within the structures themselves” (134). This conversation leads to the profound insight that “When any sector of the church stops learning, God simply overflows the structures that are in the way and works outside them with those willing to learn… God can’t be contained by the structures that claim to serve him but often try to manage and control him” (136-137). McLaren follows this up with the powerful question: “Are we a club for the elite who pretend to have arrived or a school for disciples who are still on the way” (137)?

All in all, I found this book to be worth the read because it is another important invitation to enter into a conversation about what it means to be a Christians and what it means to be a part of the Body of Christ. May this book and McLaren’s ministry help disciples who are still “on the way” find their way to God through the ancient practices that McLaren and the other author’s in this series seek to resuscitate.

Red Letter Christians by Tony Campolo

06 Tuesday May 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Book Review, Red Letter Christians, Tony Campolo

Tony Campolo has never seemed to be someone to shy away from controversial issues. It came as no surprise, then, that he dealt with “Hot-Button Issues” like gay rights, abortion, and immigration in his latest book Red Letter Christians: A Citizen’s Guide to Faith and Politics. Campolo’s book comes out along with several other recent publications (see my previous review of Jim Wallis’ The Great Awakening) that deal with faith and politics just in time for Christians to digest before they cast their votes in the 2008 Presidential election.

Campolo argues for a biblical approach to politics that goes deeper than mere party loyalties. He writes, “In reality, conservatives and liberals need each other: Conservatives maintain many lines that should never be crossed, while liberals destroy many lines that should never have existed… On some issues, Red Letter Christians are conservative and on others we are liberal. Neither end of the political spectrum has a corner on the will of God” (36-37). Campolo does not just hope to elevate the dialogue beyond seeing the world through red or blue glasses. He argues that “instead of using power to mold public policies, [Christians] should endeavor to speak with authority to those in power” (37).

Before Campolo argues for a specific understanding of politics, he argues for a particular understanding of what it means to be a Christian. Based on the title of the book, Campolo argues that “red letter Christians” are “committed to living out the things that Jesus taught” (22). In other words, the words spoken by Jesus in the Gospels, which are printed in red letters in many versions of the Bible, are lifted up as of particular importance for those who claim to be followers of Christ. This book, as a result, seeks to craft a particular approach to politics that is always faithful to the teachings of Jesus as revealed in the four Gospels.

This approach leads Campolo to articulate a fresh approach to politics that avoids many of the traps that Christians from the far right and far left have fallen into. In fact, Red Letter Christians articulates an approach to politics that will at times delight conservatives and liberals. Of course, this also means that conservatives and liberals will also be frustrated at times by the recommendations that Campolo makes. Ultimately, Campolo asks us to judge his politics not by how well it fits within a Republican or Democrat platform, but by how faithfully it puts the teachings of Jesus into practice in the realm of politics.

I found myself challenged by this book from the very beginning. Campolo argues that in order for Christians to be respected by non-Christians within the political sphere, they must “first serve the needs of others in sacrificial ways, especially the poor and oppressed” (40). Serving the other sacrificially is in itself a pretty radical concept for the way modern politics works. Whether I was reading the issues Campolo discusses under the “Global Issues,” “The Hot-Button Issues,” “The Economic Issues,” or “The Government Issues” I was challenged to reexamine many of my previously held political convictions in light of the teachings of Jesus. One of the things I really like about Tony Campolo is that he often confuses the stereotypes about evangelical Christians. In one moment he criticizes the current President, but in the next he reminds the reader that the situation is often much more complicated than it is presented in a sixty second television spot. Sometimes imperfect people have to do the best that they can in very difficult situations. This is helpful for me to remember before I judge any politician’s decision without giving adequate consideration to the complexities and real difficulties they faced in coming to the decision they made.

In some ways, I finished the book feeling more confused about the ultimate practical consideration that I brought to this book when I began reading it: Who should I vote for in the upcoming Presidential election? There is not a candidate that we could vote for that would even come close to advocating the “Red Letter Party Platform” in its entirety. Ultimately, I see this book as an important contribution because it sets aside many of the previous assumptions of the religious right that did not seem to be coming from Scripture, and it returns to the teachings of Jesus as found in Scripture. It is to Tony Campolo’s credit that he seeks to be faithful to these teachings above all else — even when it is inconvenient.

Everything Must Change – Brian D. McLaren

18 Tuesday Mar 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Book Review, Brian McLaren, Emergent, Everything Must Change

I have seemed to enjoy each one of Brian McLaren’s new books more than his last. It was, therefore, with great anticipation that I began to read his latest book: Everything Must Change: Jesus, Global Crises, and a Revolution of Hope.

McLaren seeks to address two preoccupying questions in Everything Must Change; What are the biggest problems in the world? And, What doe Jesus have to say about these global problems? These questions led to further questions like “Why hasn’t the Christian religion made a difference commensurate with its message, size, and resources? What would need to happen for followers of Jesus to become a greater force for good in relation to the world’s top problems? How could we make a positive difference (12)?”

Everything Must Change is carefully organized in order to address these questions. The book is organized into eight parts that each consist of around four very short chapters. The first four parts discuss McLaren’s “preoccupying questions,” the problem as he sees it and how Jesus relates to the questions and problems. The next three parts of the book discuss the three primary parts of what McLaren refers to as the “Societal Machine.” These parts are the Security System, the Prosperity System, and the Equity System. McLaren argues that the Societal Machine has gone suicidal. McLaren writes: “Eventually, you’d have to agree, the societal machine could grow to a size where it demanded more resources than the environment could provide and produce more wastes than the environment could absorb. At that point, the machine would go suicidal” (63). McLaren’s argument is that the Security System, Prosperity System, and Equity System are all dysfunctional and unless we find a way to reframe the story, the machine will go suicidal.

One of the major strengths of Everything Must Change is McLaren’s boldness in drawing attention to some of the ways that American culture is dysfunctional and ultimately self-defeating (or suicidal). Everything Must Change offers a needed critique of the culture of comfort and security that has proliferated without a critique from the American Church for far too long. While McLaren is certainly not the first person to offer such a critique, his growing popularity as the bearded grandfather of Emergent places him in a situation where he is able to speak to a larger and larger audience.

The ideas in this book are already put into practice in subtle ways. For example, the book itself is “green” as the dust jacket testifies that it is printed on “acid-free, environmentally friendly paper using approved green printing standards.” The copyright page further mentions that the paper is from “well-managed forests, controlled sources and recycled wood or fiber.”

McLaren mentions in a footnote that his prior book, The Secret Message of Jesus: Uncovering the Truth That Could Change Everything, should be seen as a companion volume to Everything Must Change. I would actually say that it is essential to read The Secret Message of Jesus before reading Everything Must Change because I often felt that McLaren’s discussion assumed familiarity with the arguments and information presented in The Secret Message of Jesus. In other words, the explicitly Christ-centered material is not as obviously present in Everything Must Change.

My other thought, which I touched on in my review of Tony Jones’ The New Christians, is that Brian McLaren is famous! I have been amazed at the amount of publicity surrounding this book; book displays at Barnes and Noble that John Grisham would envy, a book tour, and I even got a random email asking me to pass out fliers before a book tour stop (that was actually nowhere near where I live). It seems to me that many people who have responded to McLaren’s message are fairly cynical of celebrities and people who seem to be larger than life. Brian McLaren is coming very close to becoming a celebrity, if he is not already one. I am interested to see how folks in Emergent respond to his increasing popularity, and what would seem to be a corresponding inaccessibility. Emergent seems to really be gaining a lot of momentum, and I will be watching to see what it does with it. Is this just the beginning, or is Emergent already peaking?

Ultimately, Brian McLaren raises some very important questions in Everything Must Change. I hope this book inspires the people who claim to be followers of Jesus Christ to examine more closely their allegiance to the kingdom of comfort and security in relationship to their allegiance to the kingdom of God. In as much as McLaren encourages followers of Jesus to bring hope into a world that is on the verge of going suicidal, this book is well worth the read and promises to stimulate much needed conversations about what it means to be a follower of Jesus Christ in the twenty-first century.

Preaching as Testimony – Anna Carter Florence

04 Tuesday Mar 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Anna Carter Florence, Book Review, Preaching as Testimony

This continues the Good Readin’ series that I began a few weeks ago. I did not anticipate that it would take me this long to get to posting about this book, but sometimes life happens!

Preaching as Testimony is written by Anna Carter Florence, who is Associate Professor of Preaching at Columbia Theological Seminary. I found this book to be beautifully written and it contained some pleasant surprises in a book on preaching. The primary surprise was my favorite part about the book, Carter Florence divides the book up into three sections: stories of testimony, theories of testimony, and practicing testimony.

The first section, for me, was the highlight of the book. She relates the stories of three women who preached before the practice of women preaching was widely accepted. I tremendously enjoyed the way that Anna Carter Florence was able to relate the stories of Anne Marbury Hutchinson, Sarah Osborn, and Jarena Lee to the tradition of preaching and giving testimony.

The second section was also very interesting and helpful. In the second part of the book, “Waking Up the Secrets: Theories of Testimony,” she discusses “True Speech in the Mother Tongue: Paul Ricoeur and Walter Brueggemann” in one chapter, and “Making Trouble and Making Good News: Mary McClintock Fulkerson and Rebecca Chopp” in the other chapter. These chapters helped me to think about what is happening when we give testimony and it stretched my approach to preaching in helpful ways.

The third section, “Waking Up the Preacher: Practicing Testimony,” was probably the one that I connected with the least, though it was still definitely worth reading. Readers who are looking for practical advice on how to be a “better preacher” may be tempted to skip to this section, because this is the place where Carter Florence is the most obviously offering concrete suggestions. However, to skip to this part would be, in my view, to actually miss the most helpful insights of the book, which center around the importance of reclaiming testimony as a central part of the act of preaching. Readers who are looking for “the five keys to preaching a better sermon” will be frustrated by this book, because the very nature of testimony prevents a universal catch all approach to preaching.

This book will help preachers who are trying to find their own voices in their preaching, and are trying to figure out how to claim the ways that God has moved in their lives as they preach the Word of God.

They Like Jesus But Not the Church, Following Up

22 Tuesday Jan 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Book Review, Dan Kimball, They Like Jesus But Not the Church

I do not have the time to write a thorough review of Dan Kimball’s They Like Jesus But Not the Church. But since I mentioned starting the book in a previous post, I wanted to briefly follow up.

The short version is that the book was every bit as good as I hoped it would be. The book is very readable and flows more like a conversation than a lecture or a technical discussion. The basic organization is that it gives some thoughts about why it should matter to Christians that non-Christians like Jesus, but not the church. The second part of the book discusses in more depth what it is about the church that they don’t like. Kimball does this in a helpful way that respects both those who don’t like the church and those who are in the church. The final part of the book discusses what we can/should do about it. You really sense Kimball’s heart here. I think if he could get you to do one thing as a result of reading his book, it would be that you would commit to getting to know people who are outside of the church. Listening to their stories, befriending them, and praying for them.

If you have discovered that you have become trapped in the Christian bubble, this book will help you plan your escape. I highly recommend it.

They Like Jesus But Not the Church

16 Wednesday Jan 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review

≈ 9 Comments

Tags

Book Review, Dan Kimball, Emergent, They Like Jesus But Not the Church, unChristian

I picked up a copy today of Dan Kimball‘s book They Like Jesus But Not the Church. I have only read about half of the introduction, but it is off to an excellent start! He shares the story of speaking at an evangelism conference and the people there just not getting his approach of just trying to get to know people and actually befriending them. One of the pastors asked if he “sealed the deal” (meaning prayed the sinners’ prayer). When Kimball said that he had not and that he was trying to get to know people and befriend them the pastor responded, “Well, then you’re wasting your time, brother, and I will pray for you that you seal the deal with them.”

If that story starts to get you fired up a little bit about how much that pastor is missing the point, I bet this would be a book that would speak to you (though I can’t fully endorse it, as I have not actually read it yet). I found myself thinking, and I bet that guy didn’t even actually pray for you…

Having recently read and posted about Kinnaman and Lyon’s book UnChristian, I was struck by some obvious similarities between the insights that Kimball draws out about how the church is perceived. Here is a comparison of what Kinnaman and Lyon note that people dislike about Christians and what Kimball discusses in They Like Jesus But Not the Church:

UnChristian traits according to Kinnaman and Lyon’s research:

Outsiders see Christians as:

  • Hypocritical
  • Only concerned with conversion (getting you to pray the sinners’ prayer)
  • antihomosexual
  • sheltered
  • too political
  • judgmental

Here is what Kimball says Emerging generations think about the Church:

  • an organized religion with a political agenda
  • judgmental and negative
  • dominated by males and oppresses females
  • homophobic
  • arrogantly claims all other religions are wrong
  • full of fundamentalists who take the whole Bible literally

The similarities are remarkable and suggest that these two books really have profoundly grasped the way Christians are viewed by non-Christians. It is a wake up call.

In a previous post Dan Kimball actually noticed a comment I made about thinking it would be cool to have lunch with him and he replied. So, in case you find this post too, Dan – I have a question. Have you read UnChristian and if so how do you think it meshes with They Like Jesus But Not the Church? Oh, and will you be in the northern Oklahoma area anytime soon to grab some lunch? I know of a great Mexican place in Blackwell, OK!

Finally, here is a link on Dan Kimball’s blog where he discusses They Like Jesus But Not the Church.

After the Baby Boomers

14 Monday Jan 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

After the Baby Boomers, Book Review, Wuthnow

Today I finished reading Robert Wuthnow’s After the Baby Boomers: How Twenty- and Thirty- Somethings Are Shaping the Future of American Religion. After the Baby Boomers is an important study in the future of the American church. Wuthnow demonstrates that the church is only effectively reaching married young adults, which is significant because young adults are getting married later than they have in previous generations. Wuthnow argues that “unless religious leaders take younger adults more seriously, the future of American religion is in doubt” (17).

Wuthnow explores the role that twenty and thirty year olds will play in American religion from many different angles. Here are some things that particularly grabbed my attention:

  • “Religious ideas among young adults probably circulate more by word of mouth than through the books and magazines people read or even the sermons they hear. This means that young adults are probably influencing one another in forming opinions about religion much more than they are being shaped by the formal teachings of religious organizations” (120).
  • On facing pages there are charts that show the “Views of Premarital Sex by Religious Tradition” and “Sexual Activity among Unmarried Young Adults.” This probably shouldn’t be surprising, but it is interesting that about 42% of evangelicals said that it was always wrong to have premarital sex, but about 70% reported having sex in the past year (who were not married). And evangelicals reported having premarital sex at the smallest percentage. Mainline Protestants seem to at least be consistent: 17% think it is wrong and 78% have premarital sex. The largest disparity in the results was Black Protestants where about 37% said it was always wrong to have premarital sex and more than 90% reported having sex in the past year. My thought when I looked at these two charts was: 1) Are unmarried people in this age group really having sex at these high of rates? And 2) Because of the discrepancy in many of these groups between what they believe and what they are actually doing, I would think this suggests that there are a lot of young adults out there with feelings of guilt and shame about their sexual history. How can we bring the grace and love of God to bear in these situations in a transforming way?
  • Figure 8.10 shows the percent who say the following are extremely or very important, “Promoting democracy abroad,” “Sending troops into countries,” “Fighting global terrorism,” “Controlling biological weapons,” and “Keeping America’s military strong.” The Figure measures the responses of three groups; nonaffiliated, Other Christians, and Evangelicals. In every single category evangelicals responded with the highest percentage, with other Christians second, and nonaffiliated last. The name of this chart is “Hawks and Doves.” I have to admit I was saddened to see that being a Christian seems to make you more likely to be a hawk than a dove. Somewhere along the way Christians have placed security and national interests above their calling to be peacemakers.

These are just a few quick thoughts that I wanted to highlight. Wuthnow provides an incredible amount of material to ponder in this 297 page book. In the final chapter Wuthnow laments that “religious congregations have not done a better job of trying to figure out what young adults want and need” (216). Wuthnow’s conclusion is that “congregations can survive, but only if religious leaders roll up their sleeves and pay considerably more attention to young adults than they have been…. It would be surprising if, say in fifty years, congregations had simply disappeared. But survival and vitality are two different things” (230-231).

One final reflection that I had as I read this book: Wuthnow puts a lot of emphasis in his conclusion on the importance of religious leaders. What, if anything, does Wuthnow’s research suggest about the role that religious leaders who are in the demographic that Wuthnow is describing (i.e. 21-45 year olds) could/should play in helping to address the issues that young adults are facing? Is the church being a good steward of the young pastors that God has entrusted to it? What do you think?

unChristian

08 Tuesday Jan 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Book Review, perception of Christians, unChristian

One of the books I got for Christmas was David Kinnaman and Gabe Lyons’ unChristian: What a New Generation Really Thinks about Christianity… and Why it Matters. Kinnaman and Lyons take a hard look at the way Christians are perceived by 16-29 year old Americans. The feedback they get is not flattering and it is tough to swallow. The main value in this book is simply the recognition that young adults do not find a whole lot to like about contemporary Christians. The point of the book is not whether these perceptions are fair or accurate, but that this is the way Christians are perceived. The research in this book was done by the folks at the Barna group and they found that 16-29 year olds think that Christians are:

  • Hypocritical
  • Too focused on getting converts
  • Antihomosexual
  • Sheltered
  • Too Political
  • Judgmental

I appreciate the way that the author’s take these perceptions seriously even though they stick to their evangelical worldview. They discuss the perception that young folks have of Christians acting unChristianly and they offer a way to engage with that perception. For example one chapter addresses the perception that “Christians show contempt for gays and lesbians.” They argue for the new perception “Christians show compassion and love to all people, regardless of their lifestyle.”

The major strength of this book is that it takes a serious look at how other people see Christians and it resists the temptation to a defensive reaction. This is a helpful model that it seems to me that all Christians can learn from.

Have you read this book? What are your reactions?

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Kevin M. Watson
    • Join 369 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Kevin M. Watson
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar