• About Me

Kevin M. Watson

Kevin M. Watson

Author Archives: Kevin M. Watson

Great Post, Definitely Read This

23 Tuesday Sep 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tony Steward has a great post that is prompted by the realization that guys often miss opportunities to hold one another accountable for growing in their faith. In hopes of rectifying this, or at least providing a way forward, he offers a list of questions that guys should ask each other. I commend this post to you, but more importantly, I commend the practice of having real conversations with others about your relationship with God and your relationships with others.

Death Is Dead

23 Tuesday Sep 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Athanasius, Gregory of Nyssa, Resurrection

Yesterday, I turned in my first paper for my History of Doctrine class. The PhD students in the class have to write five preceptorial papers and one major research paper. The readings for the paper were Athanasius’ On the Incarnation and Gregory of Nyssa’s An Address on Religious Instruction. In my paper I focused on Athanasius and Gregory’s discussion of the resurrection and how Christ’s resurrection impacts the meaning and significance of death for Christians. During my time as a local pastor, I was often frustrated by the discrepancy between what I believe Scripture says about life after death and what many people in my congregation believed about life after death. This was one of the main areas where I tried to graciously communicate the good news of the gospel, in hopes that we would allow the gospel to transform our understanding of life, death, and life after death. In any case, the paper itself follows if you are interested in reading it… Continue reading →

UMC in Decline: Fact or Fiction?

19 Friday Sep 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review, links

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

7 Myths of the United Methodist Church, Craig Miller

The most recent issue of the Contact, the newspaper for the Oklahoma Conference of the United Methodist Church, mentions Craig Kennet Miller’s book 7 Myths of the United Methodist Church. I have not read the book, but find the list of myths to be interesting, especially the “myth” that the church is dying. At first glance, this book seems to be marketing itself to make the argument that the United Methodist Church is doing fine and we shouldn’t be so worried about things. However, looking a bit more carefully, the arguments of the book seem to be more subtle and it actually looks as if Miller may be attempting to strip away some of the myths that prevent United Methodism from being renewed.

If nothing else, I am interested, and will make a note to check this book out in the future. It would seem to be a vital contribution to our UM context if it helps the Church to recognize that we are not in great shape and we need to overcome some of the myths that have led to the, if nothing else, numerical decline of the denomination. However, there seems to me to be a significant group in contemporary United Methodism that stubbornly insists, in the face of all the evidence, that United Methodism is not in decline and people are worrying about nothing. In fact, I might be tempted to argue that given how far United Methodism has moved away from its heritage (Where is the method in United Methodism?) that if it is not dying, it is at least turning into something that would be unrecognizable by the early Methodists.

Have you read 7 Myths of the United Methodist Church? What was your reaction to the book? How would you characterize what Miller is trying to do in the book?

The Challenge of Being Successful

17 Wednesday Sep 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Uncategorized

≈ 11 Comments

I have recently attempted to get in touch with three different pastors who I consider to be both incredibly successful and very well known. Two of them started United Methodist Churches that have grown like crazy and have become, for many, models of how to do ministry in the United Methodist Church in the twenty-first century. (I contacted them seeking endorsements of my book which is coming out next spring.) The other is not United Methodist but also started a church that has seen amazing growth, I attempted to get in touch with him to talk about his experience with United Methodism in order to try to learn from him how to avoid some of the mistakes and barriers that Methodism has recently put up to doing a new thing in the name of the Lord.

Literally when I began writing this post I had heard from two of them and had not heard back from the third. As I was typing I got a response from the third (actually the only one who responded himself, the other two were mediated through executive assistants). I have chosen not to mention their names because I am really not trying to make anyone look bad, and this post isn’t intended to be about any particular person, but about a more general thought process I have been on as a result of trying to learn from and interact with people who have done some pretty amazing things.

This experience has made me think a lot about being nationally recognized, at least within your field of expertize. Here is a summary of my thoughts:

  • I heard back from all three of them within a week. I am impressed by this because I am guessing that they each receive a pretty high amount of correspondence. Although, I was most impressed by the quick response of the person who responded personally.
  • I immediately received a polite but firm “no” from the one I hoped to interview. I initially received a hopeful response from the first endorsement request, but a few months later received a “no.” The third, the one who directly emailed me back, wrote to say that he is traveling this week and will try to respond next week.
  • At first I was pretty cynical about the two pastors who I couldn’t even directly talk to. One of them, in particular, I really felt like if I could have a five minute conversation with would be interested in my book and would be willing to make the time to talk about it – in part because several people had said I should contact him about it because they felt that he would be interested in supporting it. But as I have continued to reflect, I have begun to realize that I have no idea what their lives and schedules are really like. I am struggling to balance starting a PhD with being a dad and a husband. I know that two of the people I contacted are husbands and parents and also happen to be the primary leader of a church that has thousands of people in worship each week. So what right do I have to expect anything from them? The next stage was sort of sadness, because I know that I really do have a lot to learn from people like them and for the most part because of their success I will not be able to have any in depth correspondence with any of them. But here is where I am today: I am wondering why I want to “rub elbows” with the big fish… or something like that. I think there are some good reasons, but I also think some are not so good… like ambition, pride, things of the like.
  • Finally, I have been struggling with the sense that networking and trying to get to know people and be known by them is a sort of necessary evil, but then that also seems too strong. I think this is as honest as I can be about where I ultimately come down on this: I feel like the book I have written is worth reading and it represents, as best as I can articulate it right now, the passion that I believe God has given me for what I have to say to the Church. However, not many people know who I am and name recognition seems to be a big factor in whether someone buys a book. So, if I can get someone else, say someone whose name you recognize, to say “Hey, this is a great book! You should read it…” then maybe more people read what I believe God has given me to say.

So the moral of the story is this: I am thinking about asking John Wesley himself to endorse my book, but I can’t think of a way to do it without using a ouija board… Just in case you are wondering, in my mind if he did endorse my book it would be something like this: “This is the best articulation of how to put Wesleyan theology into practice since… well, me! If I were re-writing the General Rules today I would add a fourth rule, buy Kevin Watson’s book A Blueprint for Discipleship.” – John Wesley, Founder of Methodism

That might help sell a few books…

Meeting the Great Grandparents

16 Tuesday Sep 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Life

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

great grandparents

My daughter Bethany has now met five great grandparents. I think that is amazing. To my knowledge I had two living great grandparents when I was born, and I was lucky enough that they both lived until I was a teenager. I was able to meet one of them once and get to know the other one very well. Of course, I have no idea what the future holds, but I feel blessed that people who were so important to me have been able to meet my first child.

Bethany met great grandparents four and five (my dad’s parents) this weekend when we went to visit them in Rochester, MN. We had a wonderful time. My life has been enriched by being the grandson of these wonderful people and they have both served as positive examples for me in many ways.

Kimball Asks Important Question about Palin

10 Wednesday Sep 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in links

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Dan Kimball, Sarah Palin

Dan Kimball has a very interesting post about the apparent contradiction between conservative Christians, who often don’t allow women to speak in church, supporting Sarah Palin’s candidacy for Vice President so enthusiastically (with the real possibility that she could be the leader of the country). You can read his post here.

Go Mustangs!

08 Monday Sep 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Life

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

football, SMU

Melissa, Bethany, and I were thrilled to get to go to our first college football game of the year this weekend. In fact, for Bethany it was her first college football game ever. And she must be a good luck charm, because SMU won (and we are realizing that doesn’t always happen here). We went with some Perkins students and their spouses and bumped into a GPRS student and his spouse as well.

It was a lot of fun, but it was also almost completely different than any previous experience that I have had with college football. For instance, when we got into the stadium and found where we were going to sit, SMU immediately scored a touchdown. Good news right? Not necessarily. What Melissa and I failed to take into consideration was the fact that Bethany has never heard several thousand people cheer for a touchdown… She started wailing. The only problem was that we could not hear her because of the noise. I looked over at her and saw this look on her face that made me forget about the touchdown… it took some getting used to, and moving to a less crowded part of the stadium, but she did adjust and seemed to really enjoy the game after the first fifteen to thirty minutes or so.

Melissa and I graduated from different schools that are in state rivals (OU and OSU) so we are really enjoying having a team that we can both genuinely root for. For those of you who don’t know anything about college football this won’t mean anything… but for those of you who do, SMU hired June Jones, formerly Hawaii’s coach, this offseason. So there is excitement about football here for the first time in quite a while. The slogan on billboards and t-shirts is “June Cometh.” From this Saturday, we look to already have a pretty good offense, but as one of my friends described it, a “pretty porous” defense.

Remembering that I have a Reader

05 Friday Sep 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in links

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

links

For the last two weeks or so, I have not checked my reader account. Here is a taste of what I have been missing:

Matt reflects on changing appointments.

Tony Steward lists his daily rule.

Andrew continues reflecting on the possibilities surrounding an internet campus.

Finally, I have recently discovered Bradley Wright’s blog and am enjoying it. This post even received two lengthy responses from the author of the work he was criticizing.

Background on the Explanatory Notes (Part II)

04 Thursday Sep 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review, Ministry, Wesley

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Explanatory Notes, John Wesley

In my reading today, I came across more information about the Explanatory Notes:

During the previous decade, John had hoped the publication of his Bible commentary, Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament, would provide doctrinal help for his preachers. The first edition, in 1755, had been prepared more hastily than Wesley had hoped. The second edition the following year was essentially a reprint, though with the errata incorporated. In 1760, however, he and Charles had embarked on a major revision of the work, further refining the biblical text and expanding the notes. They finished this new edition in 1762 and, combined with the collected Sermons on Several Occasions John had published (four volumes by 1760), it provided basic doctrinal guidelines for the preachers.

By the late summer of 1763, Wesley had firmly fixed these two resources as the measure of proper Methodist preaching. (Heitzenrater, Wesley and the People Called Methodists, 212-3)

Heitzenrater goes on to argue that the Model Deed, which controlled access to Methodist pulpits, stipulated that preachers must preach “‘no other doctrine than is contained in Mr. Wesley’s Notes Upon the New Testament, and four volumes of Sermons.’ By this stipulation, the Sermons and Notes became the doctrinal standards for the Methodist preachers.” (Heitzenrater 213)

If you are still reading, you will see that we are starting to get somewhere… The Explanatory Notes were part of the doctrinal standards of early Methodism because they were considered to be an important way of ensuring that the people who preached in Methodist pulpits were preaching a doctrine that Wesley would approve of. Thus, the Explanatory Notes were intended to play an important role in defining what was acceptable Methodist teaching.

This still leaves open for discussion the role that they do actually play today and the role that they should play today.

Background on the Explanatory Notes

03 Wednesday Sep 2008

Posted by Kevin M. Watson in Book Review, Ministry, Wesley

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

Explanatory Notes, John Wesley, United Methodist Church

In a previous post I mentioned that I am reading through John Wesley’s Explanatory Notes on the New Testament. Today, in re-reading Richard Heitzenrater’s Wesley and the People Called Methodists, I came across this passage:

The notes were largely a collation of material from John Heylyn’s Theological Lectures, John Guyse’s Practical Expositor, Philip Doddridge’s Family Expositor, and Johannes Bengel’s Gnomen Novi Testamenti. The latter was one of the first works of modern critical biblical scholarship, and Wesley adopted many of Bengel’s principles of textual criticism. Although the predominance of the material in the notes comes from these sources, Wesley wove them together in such an editorial way that he could own the combined whole. Having acknowledged his debt to these authors in the preface, Wesley chose not to document particular borrowings, as as not to ‘divert the mind of the reader from keeping close to the point in view’ (JWW, 14:235-39). (Heiztenrater, 188)

In a sense then, it would seem that one could argue that our doctrinal understanding of the New Testament comes from John Heylyn, John Guyse, Philip Doddridge, and Johannes Bengel as filtered and collated by Wesley. It is likely that I will not have time in the near future to learn more about these four men, but I would be very interested to explore this further at another time, as I do not know much about any of them, and only recognize Doddridge’s name.

The more I think about the Explanatory Notes and read them, the more surprised I am that they carry the weight of Doctrine for United Methodists. One could ask whether it is necessary to have a Doctrine for the interpretation of the New Testament, but perhaps more to the point, one could ask whether the Explanatory Notes continue to make a relevant contribution to the life of the United Methodist Church.

I would love to hear your thoughts on this.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Kevin M. Watson
    • Join 368 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Kevin M. Watson
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...